The Scientific Proof of Adam and Eve and Creation Via Genesis! Special Guest Hugh Owen!

Scientific Proof of Adam and Eve and Creation

I saw the following review of a new book on “evolution” that purports to allow us knuckle dragging, 85 IQ, “Bible-thumpers” to continue in our un-scientific, idiotic belief that Genesis is history. The book is called The Genealogical Adam And Eve and is written by physician Dr. Joshua Swamidass. The book does nothing to destroy the truth of Creation but does offer some Scientific Proof of Adam and Eve!

Listen to my 2 part series with Hugh Owen & Dr. Robert Sungenis on the reality & science of a young Earth and Created Man – in response to Father Paul Robinson – SSPX.

The above review is written by the quack pseudo-scientist Nathan H. Lents, a professor of biology at John Jay College, The City University of New York. In it Lents is arrogantly (read pridefully, like a certain serpent in Eden) dismissive of anyone who doesn’t completely agree with the “billions and billions and billions of years” THEORY of evolution. Lents proceeds to review Swamidass’s book because he has been on his side in pimping fake science and undermining the credit God is solely due for Creation.

Thus, I’ve enlisted the talents of Mr. Hugh Owen of the Saint Maximillian Kolbe Center and my esteemed guest in “The Scientific Proof of Adam and Eve and Creation Via Genesis!” Hugh is founder of the Saint Maximillian Kolbe Center for the study and defense of Creation! Hugh will present arguments counter to Lents and Swamidass’s claims – and to concur where/if possible.

Don’t miss this show!

BACKGROUND READING FROM THE KOLBE CENTER 

(taken from the Kolbe Center’s response to Fr. Paul Robinson, cited above)

According to the hypothesis of atheistic evolution, molecules spontaneously turned into human bodies over hundreds of millions of years of the same kinds of material processes that are going on now. The hypothesis of so-called “theistic evolution” takes a variety of forms. At one end of the spectrum of theistic evolutionary belief is the popular view of Dr. Ken Miller and many others who hold that God created some matter and natural laws at the moment of the alleged Big Bang and then allowed everything to evolve over hundreds of millions of years of the same kinds of material processes that are going on now until two (or more) sub-human primates conceived creatures capable of receiving a human soul who became the first human beings. At the other end of the spectrum of theistic evolutionist conjecture is the pantheistic fantasy of Fr. Teilhard de Chardin who identified god completely with the process of evolution, making it responsible for the evolution of the first humans through a process of hundreds of millions of years of death, deformity, extinction and disease. Finally, the most seductive deviation from the traditional doctrine for faithful Catholics, is “progressive creation,” the creation by God of the universe and of the natural order ex nihilo, followed by periodic creative interventions by the Creator over hundreds of millions of years, culminating in the special creation of Adam and Eve.

All of these deviations from the traditional doctrine of creation rest, to differing degrees, upon the false assumption that “things have always been the same from the beginning of creation” and that natural scientists can thus legitimately extrapolate from the present order of nature all the way back to the beginning of the universe to explain how and over what period of time all things came to be. But St. Peter goes on to explain in his second epistle why this is impossible when he writes that these “scoffers” will have to be “willfully ignorant” of the fact that:

the heavens were before, and the earth out of water, and through water, consisting by the word of God. Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished (2 Peter 3:5-6).

Fr. Robinson identifies his account of the origins of man and the universe as “progressive creation,” as defined above. However, he contends that his account is the one most in harmony with Sacred Scripture, Sacred Tradition and Magisterial teaching and that the Kolbe Center’s defense of the fiat creation of all things at the beginning of time less than ten thousand years ago actually deviates from the Magisterial teaching of the Church on creation and represents a form of “biblicism,” an over-literal interpretation of the Bible derived from Protestantism rather than from the authentic Tradition of the Catholic Church. He then scoffs at the Kolbe Center for choosing St. Maximilian Kolbe as its secondary patron, after the Immaculate Conception, because, while rejecting molecules-to-man evolution, St. Maximilian acknowledged that the science of his day taught that the universe was hundreds of millions of years old, that the solar system was not specially created, and that the Earth revolves around the sun, as in the Copernican model of the solar system. We will address each of these points in turn. CONTINUE READING