Mike Church Show PREVIEW-The Left’s Full Court Press To Make Kamala POTUS

Natural Born Citizen

• Kamala Harris cannot be President. 
• This isn’t just us saying this b/e we aren’t fans of Kamala, she can’t be President by definition of the United States Constitution.
• Don’t like it?
• Take it up with the Founding Fathers!
• International Law – 
• The Law of Nations – Only a naturalized citizen can make a Natural Born Citizen.
• What if this was the plan the whole time?
• All four years, to install the not natural born citizen?
• It is also plausible that she couldn’t have even been a Senator.
• She wasn’t born after they were naturalized, she was under the age of 16, she should also have to go through a Naturalization process.

HEADLINE: Some Questions for Kamala Harris About Eligibility | Opinion by John C Eastman

• The fact that Senator Kamala Harris has just been named the vice presidential running mate for presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden has some questioning her eligibility for the position. The 12th Amendment provides that “no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.” And Article II of the Constitution specifies that “[n]o person except a natural born citizen…shall be eligible to the office of President.” Her father was (and is) a Jamaican national, her mother was from India, and neither was a naturalized U.S. citizen at the time of Harris’ birth in 1964. That, according to these commentators, makes her not a “natural born citizen”—and therefore ineligible for the office of the president and, hence, ineligible for the office of the vice president.
• The language of Article II is that one must be a natural-born citizen. The original Constitution did not define citizenship, but the 14th Amendment does—and it provides that “all persons born…in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens.” Those who claim that birth alone is sufficient overlook the second phrase. The person must also be “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States, and that meant subject to the complete jurisdiction, not merely a partial jurisdiction such as that which applies to anyone temporarily sojourning in the United States (whether lawfully or unlawfully). Such was the view of those who authored the 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause; of the Supreme Court of the United States in the 1872 Slaughter-House Cases and the 1884 case of Elk v. Wilkins; of Thomas Cooley, the leading constitutional treatise writer of the day; and of the State Department, which, in the 1880s, issued directives to U.S. embassies to that effect.

LIVE Show PreviewsMike Church Previews